Tag urself on lisp indentation style:
;; I'm afraid of passing 80 characters
(proc1
arg1 arg2
(proc2
arg1 arg2
(cond
[(foo)
(bar 'baz 'quux)]
[else
(beep boop 'bop)])))
;; Everyone has wide monitors these days anyway right?????
(proc1 arg1 arg2
(proc2 arg1 arg2 (cond [(foo) (bar 'baz 'quux)]
[else (beep boop 'bop)])))
@cwebber when I was first learning Scheme it was in college and I indented it like C:
(define foo
(lambda (x y)
)
)
I got a direct mail from the TA about that one.
Nowadays when I do Scheme I do it's usually style #1
(define foo
(lambda (x y)
)
)
I got a direct mail from the TA about that one.
Nowadays when I do Scheme I do it's usually style #1
@KitRedgrave @cwebber To me, it's the trailing parentheses just kinda dripping off the code that look ugly. It might be more evident in, uh, maybe say FizzBuzz: https://gitlab.peach-bun.com/snippets/153
@ninjawedding @cwebber eh, ok, then just fold 'em into the line above them :p
i kinda like this style, thinking about it, because it makes it really clear that these are actually lists of things.
@ninjawedding Yeah that's probably the worst thing to do, but it's understandable how someone might make a mistake like that if they've come from something C-like.
@ninjawedding @cwebber I don't even see what's wrong with that, but maybe the C has rotted my brain so hard I'm lost forever... ;p